The public administration of territorial seas: Ukrainian case

1. Agreement on cooperation in the use of the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait. (2003). Ukraine, Russian Federation. Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 22(297), 1539. (in Ukrainian).

   Google Scholar 

2. Agreement on Fishery Issues in Azov Sea. (1993). Between the state committee of Ukraine for fisheries and fisheries and the fisheries committee of the Russian federation. Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 7(159), 423. (in Ukrainain).

   Google Scholar 

3. Babatunde, I. (2014). Delimited maritime zones and the responsibility of states in marine environmental protection under the 1982 convention on the law of the sea. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7), 413–432.

   Google Scholar 

4. Babin, B. (2019). Attempt of annexation the Crimea and maritime administration: Legal aspects of asymmetric response. Lex Portus, 3, 7–20.

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Bardin, A. (2002). Coastal state's jurisdiction over foreign vessels. Pace International Law, 14(2), 28–76.

   Google Scholar 

6. Barsegov, J u G. (1985). Dictionary of international maritime law. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenija. (in Russian).

   Google Scholar 

7. Becker-Weinberg, V. (2015). Portugal's legal regime on marine spatial planning and management of the national maritime space. Marine Policy, 61, 46–53.

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Bieda, A., Adamczyk, T., & Parzych, P. (2019). Maritime spatial planning in the European Union on the example of the Polish part of the Baltic Sea. Water, 11(3), 555.

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Boulegue, M., Lutsevych, O., & Marin, A. (2018). Civil Society Under Russia’s threat: Building Resilience in Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. The Royal Institute of International Affairs Chatham House. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-11-08-civil-society-russia-threat-ukraine-belarus-moldova-boulegue-lutsevych-marin.pdf.

10. BSIS Operation and Enhancement. Information exchange (2018). BS MOU. The Nineteenth Meeting of Port State Control Committee. PSCC 19/9.2.3. 09 April 2018. Retrieved December 20, 2019, from https://mtu.gov.ua/files/foto_to_news/PSCC%2019.9.2.3.pdf.

11. Cassese, S. (2008). Global administrative law. Cases, materials, issues (2nd ed.). Rome: Institute for International Law and Justice.

    Google Scholar 

12. Chircop, A., Dzidzornu, D., Guerreiro, J., & Grilo, C. (2008). The maritime zones of east African states in the law of the sea: Benefits gained, opportunities missed. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 16(2), 121–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Coastal warning 426/19. (2019). Notices to mariners. State hydrographic service of Ukraine. Edition no. 46. Retrieved December 8, 2019, from https://www.charts.gov.ua/viewer/web/viewer.html?file=/ntm/2019/ntm46(576-585).pdf.

14. Colombos, J. (1967). The international law of the sea (6th ed.). London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

15. Commission of the European Communities. (2000). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament on integrated coastal zone management: A strategy for Europe. Brussels, 27.09.2000 COM. Retrieved November 20, 2019, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52000DC0547&from=EN.

16. Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses. (1997). Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/8_3_1997.pdf.

17. Convention Regarding the Regime of Navigation on the Danube. (1948). Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.danubecommission.org/extranet/e-archive/convention-en.pdf.

18. Cope, P. (1981). The impact of UNCLOS III on management of the world's fisheries. Marine Policy, 3(5), 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Customs Code of Ukraine. (2012). Official bulletin of Ukraine, 32, 1175. (in Ukrainian).

    Google Scholar 

20. Directive of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine on Closure of Sea Ports. (2014). Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 54, 1461. (in Ukrainian).

21. El Tratado de la Cuenca del Plata. (1969). Comité Intergubernamental Coordinador de los Países de la Cuenca del Plata. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://cicplata.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/tratado-de-la-cuenca-del-plata.pdf.

22. Florsheim, B. L. (1970). Territorial seas: 3000-year-old question. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 36, 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

23. Grotius, H. (2004). The free sea natural law and enlightenment classics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

24. Harrison, J. (2017). Saving the oceans through law: The international legal framework for the protection of the marine environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

25. International Court of Justice. (1949). The Corfu Channel Case (Merits) Judgment. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/1/001-19490409-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.

26. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (1991). Case concerning passage through the Great Belt (Finland v. Denmark). Request for the indication of provisional measures. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/86/086-19910729-ORD-02-00-EN.pdf.

27. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (1992). Case concerning passage through the Great Belt (Finland v. Denmark). Order as of 10 September. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/86/086-19920910-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf.

28. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (2003). Case concerning land reclamation by Singapore in and around the straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore). Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_12/Order.08.10.03.E.pdf.

29. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (2019). Case concerning the detention of three Ukrainian naval vessels (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_26/C26_Order_25.05.pdf. Accessed 2 November 2019.

30. Kabanenko, I. (2017). The Kerch strait bridge: A new threat to regional stability. Eurasia Daily Monitor, 14(106). Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://jamestown.org/program/the-kerch-strait-bridge-a-new-threat-to-regional-stability/.

31. Kastrisios, Ch., & Tsoulosa, L. (2017). Maritime Zones Delimitation: Problems and Solutions. Proceedings of the International Cartographic Association Conference, Washington DC.

32. Kaye, S. (2016). A zonal approach to maritime regulation and enforcement. Routledge handbook of maritime regulation and enforcement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

33. Kirkman, H. (2006). The East Asian seas UNEP regional seas programme. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 6(3), 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Klimenko, A. (2017). Database of ships that in violation of the legislation of Ukraine and international sanctions came into the ports of the occupied Crimean peninsula since the annexation on March 18, 2014. Black Sea News. Retrieved January 14, 2020, from https://www.blackseanews.net/read/130665.

35. Klymenko, A. (2018). Russia's economic war against Ukraine in the Sea of Azov as of December 1, 2018. The Technology of Blocking the Mariupol and Berdyansk Ports. Black Sea News. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.blackseanews.net/en/read/146863.

36. Klymenko, A. (2019). A “Russian Lake”: The nine aspects of the current situation in the Black Sea. Blak Sea News. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.blackseanews.net/en/read/153503.

37. Koh, H. (2006). Why transnational law matters. Penn State Law Review, 24(4), 745–753.

    Google Scholar 

38. Kolodkin, A. L., Guculjak, V. N., & Bobrova, J. V. (2007). World Ocean. International legal regime. Main problems. Moscow: Statut. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

39. Kormych, B. A., & Bilenets, D. A. (2017). Legal regime of the customs control zone: Administrative and legal bases. Chernivtsi: Tekhnodruk. (in Ukrainian).

    Google Scholar 

40. Kuznetsov, S. O., & Averochkina, T. V. (2017). Straits used for international navigation: Some aspects of determining the legal status and regime. Lex Portus, 4, 31–47. (in Ukrainian).

    Google Scholar 

41. Lansing, R. (1910). The North Atlantic coast fisheries arbitration. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 59(3), 119–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

42. Larik, J., & Morgan, L. (2016). Oceans governance and international law of the sea: Closing the gaps. The Hague Institute for Global Justice. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.thehagueinstituteforglobaljustice.org/latest-insights/latest-insights/commentary/oceans-governance-and-international-law-of-the-sea-closing-the-gaps/.

43. Law on Fishery, Industrial Fishing and Protection of Aquatic Bioresources. (2011). Statements of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 17, 155. (in Ukrainian).

44. Law on Seaports of Ukraine. (2012). Statements of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 54, 1729. (in Ukrainian).

    Google Scholar 

45. Law on the Adjacent Zone of Ukraine. (2018). Statements of Verkhovna Rada of Ukriane, 4, 105. (in Ukrainian).

    Google Scholar 

46. Law on the Exclusive Maritime Economic Zone of Ukraine (1995). Statements of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 21, 152. (in Ukrainian).

47. Law on the State Border of Ukraine. (1991). Statements of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2, 5. (in Ukrainian).

    Google Scholar 

48. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. (2015). Statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine with regard to gross violation by the Russian Federation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://mfa.gov.ua/en/press-center/comments/4747-statement-by-the-ministry-of-foreign-affairs-of-ukraine-with-regard-to-gross-violation-by-the-russian-federation-of-the-united-nations-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea.

49. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. (2018). Ukraine drew attention of International Maritime Organization to the provocative actions of the Russian Federation in the search and rescue region of Ukraine. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://mfa.gov.ua/en/news-feeds/foreign-offices-news/63149-ukrajina-zvernula-uvagu-mizhnarodnoji-morsykoji-organizaciji-imo-naprovokativni-diji-rosiji-v-morsykomu-poshukovo-ryatuvalynomu-rajoni-ukrajini.

50. Molenaar, E. J. (2004). Multilateral hot pursuit and illegal fishing in the southern ocean: The pursuits of the Warsa I and the South Toni. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 19(1), 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

51. Nastyuk, V. Y., & Bielievtseva, V. V. (2009). Administrative-legal regimes in Ukraine. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian).

    Google Scholar 

52. New Europe Center. (2018). Pro Et Contra: Should Ukraine Denounce The Azov Agreement? Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://neweurope.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Policy-Azov_eng.pdf.

53. Nichols, S., & Sutherland, M. (2000). Good governance of Canada’s offshore and coastal zone: Towards an understanding of the marine boundary issues. Geomatica, 54(4), 415–424.

    Google Scholar 

54. Official Journal of the European Union. (2014). Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. OJ L 257. 28.8.2014, 135–145. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2014:257:FULL&from=PT.

55. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on the Temporary Closure of Sea Fishing Ports. (2016). Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 30, 1198. (in Ukrainian).

56. PortSEurope. (2019). The blockade of Ukrainian Azov Sea ports costs over €300 million: minister. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.portseurope.com/the-blockade-of-ukrainian-azov-sea-ports-costs-over-e300-million-minister.

57. Proceedings in the North Atlantic coast fisheries arbitration before the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague. (1912). Under the provisions of the general treaty of arbitration of April 4, 1908, and the special agreement of January 27, 1909, between the United States of America and Great Britain. (In twelve volumes). Vol. XI. Washington: Government Printing Office. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://archive.org/details/northatlanticcoa11permiala.

58. Repetto, M. S. (2005). Towards an ocean governance framework and national ocean policy for Peru. The United Nations: The Nippon Foundation of Japan. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/repetto_0506_peru.pdf.

59. Sage, B. (2006). Precautionary coastal states’ jurisdiction. Ocean Development & International Law, 37(3–4), 359–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

60. Schmeier, S., Gerlak, A. K., & Blumstein, S. (2016). Clearing the muddy waters of shared watercourses governance: Conceptualizing international River Basin Organizations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(4), 597–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

61. Scott, J. B. (1916). Resolutions of the Institute of international law dealing with the law of nations, with a historical introduction and explanatory notes, New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://archive.org/details/cu31924017596887.

62. Scovazzi, T. (2001). The evolution of international law of the sea: New issues, new challenges. Recueil Des Cours: Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law 2000.Academie De Droit International De La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

63. Secretariat of the International Maritime Organization. (2014). Implications of The United Nations Convention on The Law of The Sea for The International Maritime Organization. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Legal/Documents/LEG%20MISC%208.pdf.

64. Shaw, M. N. (2008). International law (6th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

65. Sridhar, R., Sachithanandam, V., Mageswaran, T., Purvaja, R., Ramesh, R., Senthil Vel, A., et al. (2016). A political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental (PESTLE) approach for assessment of coastal zone management practice in India. International Review of Public Administration, 21(3), 216–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

66. State Hydrography. (2019). State hydrography initiates creation of the maritime regime area around occupied Crimea. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://hydro.gov.ua/?p=1502&fbclid=IwAR0EB-_UIOKuUkw0bXN8cy6YWlh66cWuVh0cDzp31XPa5p8FX89u20YNzOU. (in Ukrainian).

67. Territorial integrity of Ukraine. (2014). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 March 2014. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/262.

68. The Maritime Authorities. (2000). Black Sea Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine). Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://iea.uoregon.edu/treaty-text/2000-blackseamemorandumunderstandingportstatecontrolentxt.

69. Ukrainian National News. (2019). Rocket firing will be launched in Odessa in October: Part of the Black Sea will be closed. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.unn.com.ua/uk/news/1827122-na-odeschini-u-zhovtni-povedut-raketni-strilbi-chastinu-chornogo-morya-zakriyut?fbclid=IwAR20oB2o7SEX9aCUJoLQKF8s-8GRNeP-ALHLGutlcsqQ7GApL542kMcoMkA. (in Ukrainian).

70. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. (1992). Río de Janeiro, Brazil. Agenda 21: Chapter 17. Protection of the Oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources. (Par.17.1). Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/Agenda21.pdf.

71. United Nations Treaty Series. (1963). Act Regarding Navigation and Economic Cooperation between the States of the Niger Basin. Accessed November 2, 2019. Retrieved December 13, 2019, from https://iea.uoregon.edu/treaty-text/1963-navigationeconomiccooperationnigerbasinentxt.

72. Urkosta, B. R. (2018). Russia’s strategic considerations on the sea of Azov. Special report. Warsaw: Warsaw Institute.

    Google Scholar 

73. Vallega, A. (2013). Fundamentals of Integrated coastal management. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

74. Veresha, R. V. (2016). Determination motive through the prism of the general concept of the motives of human behaviour. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(11), 4739–4750.

    Google Scholar 

75. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2014). On ensuring the rights and freedoms of citizens and the legal regime in the temporarily invaded territory of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine as of 17 Apr 2014 No 1207-VII. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1207-18.

76. Vrizo, R. (2015). Coastal state competences regarding safety of maritime navigation: Recent trends. Seqüência (Florianópolis), 71, 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

77. Wang, X. H., Pearson, S. G., Morrison, R. J., Shi, P., Xu, X., Xue, G., et al. (2011). Integrated coastal zone management research in Australia and China. Labour and Management in Development Journal, 11, 1–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references